 "In the Arvind Kejriwal case, the court has examined “the necessity and proportionality of the arrest in compliance with Section 19(1) of the PMLA”, said a legal expert (Photo: PTI)")
The case pertains to the alleged irregularities in the now-scrapped Delhi liquor policy 2021-22.
Reacting to the order, the Aam Aadmi Party said it will move to the Supreme Court.
The same bench had reserved its order on Kejriwal’s regular bail plea on July 29. Additionally, on July 17, the court reserved its order on Kejriwal’s plea challenging his arrest by the CBI in the same case.
During the July 29 hearing, the CBI opposed the Delhi CM’s plea and contended that its investigation could not have been done without Kejriwal’s arrest. On the same day, the agency also filed its final chargesheet in the case, naming Kejriwal, along with five others accused. The charge sheet did not name former Delhi deputy CM Manish Sisodia. This was CBI’s fifth and final supplementary charge sheet. Besides Kejriwal, AAP MLA Durgesh Pathak, P Sarath Chandra Reddy, Vinod Chauhan, and businessmen Amit Arora and Ashish Mathur were named.
The CBI’s counsel D P Singh had argued that there was enough evidence to show that Kejriwal was the ‘mastermind’ of the alleged scam. Meanwhile, advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing on behalf of Kejriwal, labelled the CM’s arrest as “insurance arrest”.
Kejriwal was first arrested in the case by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) on March 21. He was then arrested by the CBI on June 26 from Tihar jail while being in judicial custody.
The case pertains to the alleged irregularities in the now-scrapped Delhi liquor policy 2021-22. The policy was introduced in November 2021 and scrapped in September 2022 months after Delhi Lieutenant Governor, V K Saxena, recommended a CBI probe in the policy in May.
First Published: Aug 05 2024 | 3:34 PM IST
