Categories
Kolkata Police crack down on over 5 attempts to reveal the identity of the Kasba gangrape survivor. Authorities issue stern warning of legal action under IPC and IT Act
In a disturbing turn of events following the high-profile gangrape case in Kolkata’s Kasba area, authorities are now confronting a new threat—attempts to reveal the identity of the survivor. At least 5+ instances of social media posts and online discussions allegedly disclosing the survivor’s personal details have prompted stern warnings from Kolkata Police. Officials are now invoking strict legal provisions under Section 228A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and relevant clauses of the Information Technology Act, vowing serious repercussions for those violating the law.
This case, already a flashpoint for debates on women’s safety, policing, and civic responsibility in metropolitan India, has now sparked a parallel conversation about the ethical responsibilities of media and the digital public. Here’s a detailed breakdown of the incident, the response, the laws involved, and what this means going forward.
The Kasba gangrape incident occurred in mid-June 2025, when a young woman in her 20s was allegedly abducted and raped by multiple assailants in a moving car in the upscale Kasba locality of south Kolkata. According to the FIR, the woman was offered a ride late at night by men posing as ride-hailing drivers. She was later found semi-conscious and injured near the bypass, leading to widespread protests and public outrage.
The Kolkata Police arrested three men within 48 hours, and investigations are ongoing.
As forensic reports and survivor testimonies surfaced, the case garnered national media attention, leading to an influx of social media discussions and amateur ‘sleuthing.’
The police have now shifted partial focus from the criminal investigation to curbing the illegal dissemination of the survivor’s identity online. In a press statement, Kolkata Commissioner of Police Vineet Kumar Goyal emphasized:
“Disclosing the identity of a rape survivor is not only unethical but a punishable criminal offense. We are monitoring platforms and will not hesitate to take strict action against any individuals or portals involved in this act.”
Sources from the Cyber Crime Cell confirmed that they have identified over 5 social media accounts, including pages with significant followings, that either directly named the survivor or shared photos, college details, or residential references that could lead to her identification.
The Indian legal framework has clear provisions protecting the identity of sexual assault survivors. Section 228A of the IPC makes it a criminal offense to disclose the identity of a rape survivor, including name, address, photograph, family details, and institutional affiliations.
Penalties under Section 228A IPC:
- Imprisonment up to 2 years
- Fine
- Or both
This applies to:
- Individuals
- Media houses
- Social media platforms
- Bloggers or influencers
The Supreme Court of India, in several rulings, has emphasized that even indirect disclosure, which leads to deduction of the survivor’s identity, is illegal.
Apart from IPC, authorities are also invoking provisions from the Information Technology Act, particularly:
- Section 66E (Violation of privacy)
- Section 67 (Obscenity in electronic form)
Under these laws, violators may face:
- Imprisonment up to 3 years
- Hefty fines
- Permanent deletion or suspension of social media handles/pages
Kolkata Police’s cyber cell is in active coordination with Meta, Google, X (formerly Twitter), and YouTube to identify the IP addresses and accounts involved in violating these norms.
A parallel concern has emerged over irresponsible media coverage, particularly on digital portals chasing “clickbait” headlines. Some reports have allegedly included images of the survivor’s neighborhood, indirectly putting her and her family at risk of further trauma and stigmatization.
The Press Council of India and the News Broadcasting and Digital Standards Authority (NBDSA) have been urged to issue advisory notices to news organizations, reminding them of the ethical guidelines laid out in the ‘Norms of Journalistic Conduct.’
Several women’s rights groups, including Nari Raksha Manch and Swayam Kolkata, have condemned the coverage and demanded a blanket blackout of all survivor-identifying content.
Amid the legal chaos, the most affected remains the survivor herself, whose ordeal has not ended with the crime. Sources indicate that the woman is currently undergoing medical and psychological treatment at a private facility under police protection.
According to a counselor working on the case, “There’s already trauma from the assault, but seeing her personal details online has made her paranoid and re-traumatized. These violations of privacy feel like a second assault.”
Women’s rights groups are now calling for enhanced support for survivors, including:
- Anonymous protection shelters
- Legal guardianship
- Fast-tracked trials
- 24×7 psychological helplines
The case has taken on political overtones, with opposition leaders slamming the ruling state government for what they call “an unsafe and insensitive urban ecosystem.” In a recent statement, BJP leader Agnimitra Paul said:
“While the police have arrested the perpetrators, where is the preventive ecosystem that should exist in a city like Kolkata? And why must survivors go through this second layer of trauma through social media leaks?”
In contrast, Trinamool Congress leaders defended the police, calling their actions swift and in line with legal procedure. They praised the cyber unit’s vigilance and asked citizens to “cooperate responsibly” rather than contribute to digital chaos.
The police are in the process of preparing formal legal notices to those involved in disclosing the survivor’s identity. Legal proceedings under IPC and the IT Act are likely to commence by next week.
Meanwhile, there is increasing demand from civil society to:
- Enforce stronger digital content monitoring
- Train influencers and citizen journalists in ethical reporting
- Launch public awareness campaigns about survivor protection laws
Social media platforms may also come under scrutiny for not having sufficient automated filters to catch and block such content before it spreads.
