Categories
Dhurandhar actor Naveen Kaushik feels Ranveer Singh deserved more recognition than Akshaye Khanna: ‘It’s unfair’. Insights into his comments, fan reactions, and the debate on award recognition in Bollywood.
In an industry where acclaim is often selective and narratives can overshadow nuance, actor Naveen Kaushik, currently seen in Dhurandhar, has sparked a fresh debate about recognition, performance hierarchy, and fairness in Bollywood. In a candid interaction, Kaushik openly stated that Ranveer Singh deserved far more recognition than Akshaye Khanna, calling the imbalance in praise “unfair.”
The comment has since ignited conversations across social media and film circles, reopening discussions on how performances are evaluated, how awards and praise are distributed, and whether public perception sometimes overlooks sheer acting range.
Naveen Kaushik Speaks Out
Naveen Kaushik, known for his grounded performances and thoughtful insights, did not mince words when asked about the audience and industry response to Dhurandhar. While acknowledging Akshaye Khanna’s seasoned brilliance, Kaushik emphasized that Ranveer Singh’s performance required extraordinary transformation and emotional risk, which, in his view, did not receive proportional appreciation.
“Akshaye sir was brilliant, no doubt,” Kaushik said. “But what Ranveer did in Dhurandhar was something else altogether. The preparation, the emotional shifts, the physicality — that kind of performance doesn’t happen often. It’s unfair that it didn’t get the recognition it deserved.”
Understanding the Context of Dhurandhar
Dhurandhar is a character-driven film that places heavy emotional and psychological demands on its cast. Set against a backdrop of power, ambition, and moral ambiguity, the film relies less on spectacle and more on nuanced performances.
While Akshaye Khanna plays a character rooted in restraint and intellectual menace — a space he has mastered over decades — Ranveer Singh’s role demanded extreme emotional volatility, physical transformation, and raw vulnerability.
Film critics largely praised both actors, but post-release discourse saw Akshaye Khanna emerge as the “scene-stealer”, while Ranveer’s work was often described as “intense” without deeper examination.
Ranveer Singh’s Performance: A Risk-Heavy Role
Ranveer Singh has built a reputation for immersion, often losing himself in characters to an almost unsettling degree. In Dhurandhar, this tendency was on full display.
Key Elements of Ranveer’s Performance
- Significant physical transformation
- Dialect and body-language recalibration
- Emotionally exhausting monologues
- Moral conflict portrayed without heroism
Naveen Kaushik pointed out that such roles carry a higher risk of misinterpretation.
“When an actor plays loud or volatile characters, people often miss the layers,” he said. “Restraint is easier to praise. Chaos is harder to understand.”
Why Akshaye Khanna Received More Praise
Akshaye Khanna’s performance was widely celebrated for its quiet authority and minimalism. Critics and audiences alike often gravitate toward subtle performances, especially when delivered by actors known for intellectual roles.
Industry observers note that Akshaye’s screen presence naturally commands respect, and his portrayal aligned closely with what viewers expect from him — controlled, measured, and menacing without excess.
This, according to Kaushik, may have inadvertently tilted the recognition scale.
Recognition vs Familiarity
One of the core issues raised by Kaushik is how familiarity influences praise.
“Akshaye sir doing subtle brilliance is expected — and that’s exactly why people praise it instantly,” Kaushik explained. “But when someone like Ranveer takes a leap into discomfort, that leap sometimes goes unnoticed.”
Film analysts agree that performances which challenge audience comfort often take longer to be appreciated. Some are reassessed years later, long after award seasons end.
The Awards Conversation
While Dhurandhar featured prominently in year-end lists and discussions, Ranveer Singh’s absence from several major acting award nominations raised eyebrows.
Kaushik did not accuse any institution directly but questioned the broader system.
“I’m not talking about trophies,” he clarified. “I’m talking about acknowledgment. About saying — yes, this performance mattered.”
The statement resonates with a long-standing critique of Bollywood’s awards culture, which has often been accused of being influenced by narrative momentum, industry politics, and public sentiment rather than purely artistic merit.
Industry Reactions and Divided Opinions
Kaushik’s remarks have divided opinion within the industry.
Supportive Voices
Several actors and filmmakers privately echoed his sentiments, agreeing that Ranveer’s performance demanded more discourse.
A casting director noted, “Roles like Ranveer’s are physically and mentally draining. They take years off an actor. That effort should be recognized.”
Counterviews
Others argued that appreciation is subjective and that Akshaye Khanna’s performance resonated more strongly with audiences.
“Recognition isn’t a zero-sum game,” said one trade analyst. “Just because one actor is praised doesn’t mean another is diminished.”
Ranveer Singh’s Silence
Interestingly, Ranveer Singh has remained silent on the debate. Known for avoiding public commentary on awards and comparisons, he has instead focused on upcoming projects.
Industry insiders suggest that Ranveer is aware his performance will find its audience over time.
“Some roles age well,” said a producer associated with the film. “This is one of them.”
A Larger Conversation About Fairness
Naveen Kaushik’s comments have struck a chord because they tap into a deeper issue: how Bollywood defines merit.
Is subtlety inherently superior to intensity?
Do established personas influence critical reception?
Are transformative performances judged more harshly?
These questions extend beyond Dhurandhar and reflect the evolving nature of Indian cinema, where performance styles are increasingly diverse.
Naveen Kaushik: Speaking From Experience
Kaushik himself has often played characters that sit outside mainstream appreciation. His willingness to speak up, many feel, comes from personal understanding.
“I’ve seen how some performances get boxed,” he said. “I felt I had to say this.”
His comments were not framed as criticism of Akshaye Khanna, but rather as a call for broader, fairer appreciation.
What This Means for Bollywood
The debate sparked by Kaushik’s statement may not change awards retrospectively, but it does add to a growing push for more nuanced critical engagement.
As audiences become more discerning and platforms more diverse, performances like Ranveer Singh’s may increasingly find validation beyond traditional benchmarks.
Conclusion
Naveen Kaushik’s assertion that Ranveer Singh deserved more recognition than Akshaye Khanna in Dhurandhar has reignited a necessary conversation about fairness, perception, and performance in Bollywood.
Whether one agrees or not, the discussion highlights an essential truth: great performances are not always immediately understood — but they leave a lasting imprint.
Also Read : Mumbai suburban railway to begin trials for 18-car local trains in January
