Categories
Actor Inam-ul-Haq addresses the controversy surrounding his viral music video co-star Radhika Yadav, clarifying her absence from social media amid ongoing rumors linked to a murder case.
Actor Inam‑ul‑Haq Breaks Silence on Radhika Yadav Murder Case
Introduction
Actor Inaam ul Haq, who recently appeared alongside tennis player Radhika Yadav in a music video titled “Karwaan”, has publicly addressed the tragic murder that shocked Gurugram. Radhika, 25, was allegedly shot dead by her father, Deepak Yadav, at their home in Sushant Lok on July 10, 2025. As speculation mounts over the motive, Inaam offers new insights into Radhika’s state of mind before the tragedy—and firmly denies any deeper connection between them beyond their professional collaboration
Background: The Music Video That Became Viral
The music video was shot in Noida in 2024 under LLF Records, featuring Radhika and Inaam in a romantic story. Released online, the video went viral recently following Radhika’s murder, sparking public interest in her life beyond tennis.
According to Inaam, the shoot wrapped in roughly five hours. He highlights that Radhika showed professionalism and enthusiasm; she even shared she hoped to enter the entertainment industry in ads, films, or more music videos.
“She Has No Social Media”
A central point Inaam made is that Radhika had no active social media presence when the video went viral. He explained that she had deactivated and reactivated her Instagram account two or three times after the video’s release, suggesting she had mixed feelings about being in the public eye.
“She has no social media. There is just a video clip on YouTube, that’s why it is being highlighted repeatedly,” he said.
This clarification countered rumors that Radhika was actively promoting the video, and suggested her father’s disapproval over public exposure might be overstated.
Family Approval and On‑Set Atmosphere
Inaam emphasized that Radhika’s mother was present on set and that she told him her father liked the song—indicating family approval of the project
“She came to the shooting with her mother. On the set, she also mentioned that her father liked the song, which means she took permission from her father”—he told ANI .
This weakens the narrative that the video itself ignited a family clash, though police continue to investigate all potential angles
“Just a Co‑actor”—No Emotional Involvement
Inaam firmly rejects any suggestion of a deeper relationship. He described Radhika strictly as a co‑actor, saying:
“She was an actor to me. … We just gave her a good‑luck amount. The production of the video was unpaid. After that, we never contacted”
He also expressed dismay that some are attempting to add a Hindu‑Muslim angle to the case:
“I don’t know why it is being done. I don’t have to do anything with this case.”
Context: The Broader Murder Investigation
The tragedy unfolded in their Gurugram home on July 10, 2025, when Deepak Yadav allegedly shot his daughter four times, reportedly from behind while she was preparing food for her mother’s birthday celebr.
He later admitted to the crime, citing villagers’ taunts and his daughter’s growing independence—particularly her tennis academy—as threats to his pride and reputation.
Diverging Theories: Money, Pride, or the Video?
Police are exploring multiple potential motives:
- Financial Independence: Radhika’s decision to start and manage a tennis academy reportedly sparked tension, with Deepak allegedly feeling society was “questioning his dignity” .
- Social Pressure: Neighbors say Deepak was distressed by accusations that he lived off his daughter’s earnings and faced caste-based pressure over her work and marriage choices Hindustan Times.
- Music Video Link: Some media outlets speculate the video provoked disapproval, but Inaam’s statements and police interventions have downplayed this as the sole trigger .
Authorities emphasize that no angle is being ruled out, and investigators are carefully reviewing each possible motive and lead.
What Inaam’s Words Add
Inaam’s public statements provide clarity on a few fronts:
- He confirms no personal or romantic connection—they met only professionally.
- He confirms family awareness and nominal approval of the video.
- He highlights Radhika’s unease with social media, suggesting she didn’t seek fame suspiciously.
- He dismisses the rise of a religious or communal narrative around the case.
All of this supports neither a sensational conspiracy nor a discreet personal motive—but underscores a complex emotional and social backdrop to the tragedy.
Conclusion: A Co‑actor’s Perspective Amid a National Nightmare
Inaam ul Haq’s calm, factual recounting aims to strip away rumors in a case laden with grief, family drama, and social intricacies. He paints Radhika as an earnest, talented young woman—excited about new opportunities but cautious about public exposure. His account aligns with the police’s cautious approach, rejecting easy answers and acknowledging the need to examine deeper layers of family pressure, societal stigma, and financial independence.
As the investigation continues, police are expected to release more findings once they conclude interrogation and forensic analysis. Inaam’s testimony offers a measured, professional voice—reminding us that sometimes, a co‑actor’s simple truth can be the clearest insight into a life tragically cut short.
READ ALSO…….Tennis Tragedy: Father Shoots 25-Year-Old Daughter Radhika Dead in Gurugram Over Academy Dispute
